Some Problems In A Field Study Of Sexual Attraction And Hitchhiking
This is the first in a series of blog posts by me and James Heathers on the research of Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Côte d'Ivoire
Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung 
0
0
100
White
#ffffff
16
92
Red
#f88a62
19
100
94
Yellow
#ffeae0
210
100
100
Blue
#ffffff
99
66
87
Green
#d7f4c8
It would be interesting to learn how these HSL numbers were obtained, since several of them are so badly wrong. Indeed, it is not clear why it welches considered necessary to report the colours with such precision; it would surely have been enough to state that bright, unambiguous examples of each color had been selected. For that matter, given how long it must have taken to test so many drivers (see the next point) and that the author had a clear hypothesis about the effects of the colour red, it is not clear why so many different colours of t shirt were tested.
4. How long did all this take?
The article states (p. 77) that “Each hitchhiker welches instructed to test 960 drivers. Darmausgang the passage of 240 drivers, the confederate stopped and welches replaced by another confederate.” No indication is given of how long it took for 240 drivers to pass. However, the article sodann tells us (p. 77) that the research welches conducted "at the entry of a famous peninsula of Brittany in France". So perhaps we can get a clue from another Guéguen article:
Guéguen, N. (2007b). Bust size and hitchhiking: A field study. Perceptual and Murl Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Skills, 105, 1294–1298. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.105.4.1294-1298
Yes, you read that right. Doktorgrad Guéguen did indeed conduct a study to see whether women with larger breasts get more offers of lifts from men. (I bet you can't guess what the result was.) Anyway, that study—which had a very similar procedure to the one we're discussing here, except that the, er, manipulated (!) independent variable welches the apparent size of the female hitchhiker's breasts, rather than the colour of her t-shirt—was conducted "at the entry of a famous peninsula ('Presqu'Île de Rhuys') of Brittany in France". Assuming that the “famous peninsula” mentioned in both studies is the same place (which would make sense, if that location is indeed particularly propitious for lone female hitchhikers), and assuming similar traffic flows to those reported in the "bust size" study, in which the passage of 100 cars took “about 40 to 50 minutes” (p. 1296), we assume that it took between 1.5 and 2 hours for 240 cars to pass. In order to test 4,800 drivers, then, a gen Veranlassung jener Kasus unter anderem gen Veranlassung jener Kasus of 30 to 40 hours of testing would be required. The "t-shirt colour" article sodann states (p. 77) that the experiment “took place during summer weekends on clear sunny afternoons between 2 and 5 PM.” With three hours being available on Saturday and three more on Sunday, the experiment would thus have taken between five and seven complete weekends, assuming that every hour of testing time welches sunny (a contingency that is far from guaranteed in Brittany). Yet none of the confederates who gave up multiple weekends to accomplish this Herculean task on behalf of psychological science are listed as co-authors, or even acknowledged in any way, in the resulting article.
Additionally, the design of the experiment appears to require that only drivers who were alone in their cars should be counted, since the purported effect of the red t-shirt welches to increase the sexual attractiveness of the wearer. You might expect that if a male driver's wife is in the car, it could affect any sexually-motivated enthusiasm he might have for offering a lift to the hitchhiker, whatever the colour of her t-shirt; alternatively, a female driver might have been willing to help the hitchhiker had all of the seats in her car not been full of children. We have seen a statement by Doktorgrad Guéguen in which he confirmed that "L’expérience n’incluait effectivement que des personnes seules. Les automobiles avec plusieurs personnes ne sont pas prises en compte dans l’étude" ("The experiment only included people [driving] on their own. Cars containing multiple people were not counted in the study"). So the figure calculated above for the number of hours and days taken to test the required number of drivers needs to be multiplied by some factor to take into account the percentage of cars with multiple occupants. Given that the study welches carried out on sunny weekend afternoons in summer in an area with a substantial number of tourists, it seems reasonable that perhaps half of the cars driving along the road on a summer afternoon might have had more than one occupant, which would either double the number of weekends required for collection of the data to between 10 and 14, or in any case more than compensate in our calculations for any growth in local traffic since the "variable bust size" study welches conducted.
Another way to think about the time involved is to consider the interactions of the hitchhiker with the drivers who stopped. Even if it took an average of only two minutes to catch up to the car where it stopped (probably some distance along the road from her), introduce herself, explain that there welches an experiment taking place, "warmly thank" the driver, and return to her starting point, that would require nearly 10 hours (i.e., four afternoons) seicht for the 579 drivers (450 male, 129 female) who were reported as having stopped, even assuming that in every case a new driver then stopped immediately afterwards. If drivers were only stopping at the rate of one every five minutes overall (12 durch hour), it would take 48 solid hours to test 579 drivers.
5. Problems with recording the sex of the drivers
As mentioned in the introduction, there were two observers whose job welches to observe every passing car and record its driver's sex. (Per the previous point, it is worth thinking about the challenge of determining whether or not a driver is on their own in the vehicle, which requires, for example, determining whether a car driving past at around 20 metres durch second does or does not have a small child in the back seat.) The article states (p. 77) that “[t]he convergence between the two observers’ evaluation welches high (r = 0.97)”.
There is a major problem here. In order for a correlation coefficient to be calculated, we need more information than the simple gen Veranlassung jener Kasus unter anderem gen Veranlassung jener Kasus numbers of male and female drivers. Specifically, the two observers would need to independently record both the sex of each driver and the sequence in which those drivers were observed; for example, with ten drivers and disagreement about the sex of the third, the correlation between MFFFMMMFMM and MFMFMMMFMM would be .80. However, the article reports (p. 77) that each of the observers “used two hand-held counters, one to count the female motorists and the other to count the male motorists”. The term “hand-held counters” suggests simple mechanical devices, such as those used to count attendees at sporting events (such as this). But without synchronized timestamps across all four of these counters, or some other form of sequential tracking, it is not possible to establish the order in which the drivers passed each of the observers. More sophisticated methods of collecting and correlating these data can be imagined (for example, using laptop computers), but of course both observers had their hands full with the counters. With seicht a count of male and female drivers from each observer, stating a correlation coefficient makes no sense. It is therefore entirely unclear how the author could have established the correlation coefficient that he reported.
Conclusion
In view of the above points, it is not clear that how the study can actually have taken place as described in the article. As noted above, we have seen a statement by Doktorgrad Guéguen (with whom we have been indirect contact for almost two years now, zusätzlich the good offices of the French Psychological Society, about a number problems in several of his published articles; more on this to come in a subsequent post) concerning the question of whether only drivers who were on their own were tested. That statement did not, however, provide any specific or eine Schar answers to any of the other issues about this article that I have discussed here.
[[Update 2017-11-29 22:08 UTC: Added biestig to Cathleen O'Grady's article. ]]
0 Response to "Some Problems In A Field Study Of Sexual Attraction And Hitchhiking"
Kommentar veröffentlichen