Should Researchers Make Money From Books?
I missed this tweet when it appeared yesterday. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung By the time someone pointed me to the rather animated thread that followed, it had gone quiet again. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung (Daniël put out an earlier tweet on the same subject here, but the follow-up thread welches a lot shorter.) Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung
At one point Daniël revealed that if you want him to come to your university or conference and give some version of his excellent MOOC on statistical inferences (I took it, I passed, I am now quite a bit less ill-informed on several statistical topics) then he will charge you $1,000. But I think that he would argue—and I certainly wouldn't object—that being compensated for your time to show up somewhere in person is not unreasonable. (I asked Daniël to comment on this post before I published it. He pointed out that he does plenty of other teaching for free. He demzufolge adds that the best way to follow his course is to take it online, because there are no "ums" and "erms", and you can schedule your own bathroom breaks.)
Daniël's argument, if I've understood it correctly, is based on the following points:
1. The general principle that knowledge should be freely available.
2. The acknowledgement that in many (most?) cases, the money that paid for either (a) the specific empirical research that led to the findings being discussed in the book, or (b) the basic academic job of the person writing the book, came from taxpayers. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung I don't think I've ever discussed "Politics with a capital P" with Daniël, not least because he and I don't get to vote in the same country, but I hope he will tolerate me guessing that he is probably somewhere to the left of centre. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung I find it particularly commendable that he frequently communicates in public the awareness that the money that pays his salary does not fall from the skies every time it rains in Rotterdam(*).
3. A belief that what you have learned, what you have discovered, what you "know", doesn't "belong to you" (cf. point 1).
A quick pause for full disclosure (and a shameless plug) here: I am one of the editors of this forthcoming book (**), for which I will get a royalty of about $7 for every copy sold. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Actually, this needn't be a pause --- it can be an interesting case study of Daniël's logic. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Some of the knowledge that went into my contribution to that book (which, förmlich from being the principal assembler and coordinator of the overall manuscript, welches as a chapter author and a critical reviewer of many of the chapters) welches acquired while I welches a *paying* Master's student (my MSc cost me about $12,000 in fees, wie auch probably another $8,000 in travel and lodging expenses). Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung A little has been acquired in my more recent role as a non-paying, but non-salaried PhD student. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Süßmost welches waagerecht from reading, interacting with people, and some attempts at critical thinking. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung My situation in science is obviously quite atypical, but any system that attempts to determine what is either legally or morally acceptable has to be able to define and cope with edge cases. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung On the other hand, my co-editors are (as far as I know) full-time salaried academics. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Should different rules apply to the various editors of the same book? Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Who is going to make and enforce these rules?
Back to Daniël's points: I sort of agree and sort of don't. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung (People who have read some of my, er, "output" are sometimes surprised to find how ambivalent I am on many issues.) Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Writing a book is hard work --- it's almost certainly a qualitatively different experience from writing a journal article. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung (I haven't written a book from scratch. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung But I know how hard it is to coordinate a big manuscript, and I did translate a full-length book [PDF] --- one which, incidentally, had previously been scanned and put angeschlossen so that the author couldn't expect to receive much in the way of royalties from its sale afterwards. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Also, many books by academics combine accounts of their own (or others') research with their interpretations of what these might mean for society. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Some of Roy Baumeister's (sometimes provocative ***) books are a good example of this, I think.
On the other hand, I think that people who defend the idea of deriving income from books need to check that their logic on this point follows their logic when it comes to the publishing of scientific articles. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Süßmost of the people who responded to Daniël's tweets (at least, among the names I recognised) are people who strongly defend open access publishing. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung But it's very easy to denounce the evils of publishing companies when you don't get any revenue yourself from their output. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Among the subset of pro-open access people who have demzufolge written books, I don't see many of them exhorting people to place Portable Document Format copies of those books on Sci-Hub. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung (Anyone want to bet that we will not hear at some point of a scandal whereby some researcher or other has been taking kickbacks from the article processing charges --- which are typically paid for out of grant money --- at open access journals? Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung I rasen to add that I have no evidence that this is taking place at the moment, but I would be amazed if it didn't happen. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung People can be very... creative when it comes to spending other people's money.)
One area where I feel less doppelwertig is in the writing of "popular" books. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung If you leverage your government-funded research and/or status as a professor at a publicly-funded university into pop science or self-help books, seminars, and pay-to-listen podcasts, not to mention sponsored keynotes, corporate consulting gigs, and public speaking appearances, then I think that you ought to be making more of a contribution back than waagerecht income tax on the royalties and fees, especially since most of the work that got you that speaking gig welches probably done by someone else, who may not even believe in the research any more. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung (I would have included TED talks in this list, but apparently TED speakers don't get paid. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung I'm sure they all give those talks out of the goodness of their hearts, and not in any way out of a consideration for how they might leverage their appearance into other, more lucrative speaking opportunities.) Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Naturally, as mit Mitarbeit von Seiten the discussion a couple of paragraphs earlier, I don't have a proposed practical solution for this.
In summary, I find this an interesting debate. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Perhaps it's destined to remain theoretical for the foreseeable future (apart from anything else, academic norms tend to span the boundaries of verfassungsgemäß jurisdictions), but I think it's worth discussing and I'm glad Daniël raised it.
(*) It would be nice if money did arrive that way, because I lived there for four years and it rains a lot, often horizontally.
(**) Yes, that's a great picture on the cover. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung It's by my brother-in-law, and I believe that he will get a fee for it. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Is this nepotism? Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung I waagerecht wanted a non-boring cover design (check out what most handbook cover art is like) and I knew that Tony welches pretty handy with a brush; this is a picture that he had painted a while ago. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Should we have had a call for tenders to avoid possible questions about nepotism? Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Hmmm.
(***) I linked to Amazon here, but if you don't believe that academics should benefit from writing books about their own or other people's research, you can find a full Portable Document Format of the book without too much trouble. ;-)
Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Côte d'Ivoire I think it's tolerabel to say that Daniël didn't get a lot of takers for his idea. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung (I'll let you read the thread/s yourself, as I find that one embedded tweet in a blog post is already annoying enough, especially when reading on a mobile device.) Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung There were discussions about the remuneration system for US academics whereby many of them don't get a salary for three months in the summer (this seems utterly weird to Europeans, but our American colleagues waagerecht treat it as part of the landscape), as well as questions about intellectual property.Writing a book based on stuff you've learned as an academic and selling it, is like a road worker building a road and asking you for toll.— Daniël Lakens (@lakens) March 17, 2017
At one point Daniël revealed that if you want him to come to your university or conference and give some version of his excellent MOOC on statistical inferences (I took it, I passed, I am now quite a bit less ill-informed on several statistical topics) then he will charge you $1,000. But I think that he would argue—and I certainly wouldn't object—that being compensated for your time to show up somewhere in person is not unreasonable. (I asked Daniël to comment on this post before I published it. He pointed out that he does plenty of other teaching for free. He demzufolge adds that the best way to follow his course is to take it online, because there are no "ums" and "erms", and you can schedule your own bathroom breaks.)
Daniël's argument, if I've understood it correctly, is based on the following points:
1. The general principle that knowledge should be freely available.
2. The acknowledgement that in many (most?) cases, the money that paid for either (a) the specific empirical research that led to the findings being discussed in the book, or (b) the basic academic job of the person writing the book, came from taxpayers. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung I don't think I've ever discussed "Politics with a capital P" with Daniël, not least because he and I don't get to vote in the same country, but I hope he will tolerate me guessing that he is probably somewhere to the left of centre. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung I find it particularly commendable that he frequently communicates in public the awareness that the money that pays his salary does not fall from the skies every time it rains in Rotterdam(*).
3. A belief that what you have learned, what you have discovered, what you "know", doesn't "belong to you" (cf. point 1).
A quick pause for full disclosure (and a shameless plug) here: I am one of the editors of this forthcoming book (**), for which I will get a royalty of about $7 for every copy sold. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Actually, this needn't be a pause --- it can be an interesting case study of Daniël's logic. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Some of the knowledge that went into my contribution to that book (which, förmlich from being the principal assembler and coordinator of the overall manuscript, welches as a chapter author and a critical reviewer of many of the chapters) welches acquired while I welches a *paying* Master's student (my MSc cost me about $12,000 in fees, wie auch probably another $8,000 in travel and lodging expenses). Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung A little has been acquired in my more recent role as a non-paying, but non-salaried PhD student. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Süßmost welches waagerecht from reading, interacting with people, and some attempts at critical thinking. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung My situation in science is obviously quite atypical, but any system that attempts to determine what is either legally or morally acceptable has to be able to define and cope with edge cases. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung On the other hand, my co-editors are (as far as I know) full-time salaried academics. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Should different rules apply to the various editors of the same book? Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Who is going to make and enforce these rules?
Back to Daniël's points: I sort of agree and sort of don't. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung (People who have read some of my, er, "output" are sometimes surprised to find how ambivalent I am on many issues.) Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Writing a book is hard work --- it's almost certainly a qualitatively different experience from writing a journal article. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung (I haven't written a book from scratch. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung But I know how hard it is to coordinate a big manuscript, and I did translate a full-length book [PDF] --- one which, incidentally, had previously been scanned and put angeschlossen so that the author couldn't expect to receive much in the way of royalties from its sale afterwards. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Also, many books by academics combine accounts of their own (or others') research with their interpretations of what these might mean for society. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Some of Roy Baumeister's (sometimes provocative ***) books are a good example of this, I think.
On the other hand, I think that people who defend the idea of deriving income from books need to check that their logic on this point follows their logic when it comes to the publishing of scientific articles. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Süßmost of the people who responded to Daniël's tweets (at least, among the names I recognised) are people who strongly defend open access publishing. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung But it's very easy to denounce the evils of publishing companies when you don't get any revenue yourself from their output. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Among the subset of pro-open access people who have demzufolge written books, I don't see many of them exhorting people to place Portable Document Format copies of those books on Sci-Hub. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung (Anyone want to bet that we will not hear at some point of a scandal whereby some researcher or other has been taking kickbacks from the article processing charges --- which are typically paid for out of grant money --- at open access journals? Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung I rasen to add that I have no evidence that this is taking place at the moment, but I would be amazed if it didn't happen. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung People can be very... creative when it comes to spending other people's money.)
:format(jpeg):mode_rgb():quality(90)/discogs-images/R-2912781-1306964760.jpeg.jpg){kind=link}
One area where I feel less doppelwertig is in the writing of "popular" books. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung If you leverage your government-funded research and/or status as a professor at a publicly-funded university into pop science or self-help books, seminars, and pay-to-listen podcasts, not to mention sponsored keynotes, corporate consulting gigs, and public speaking appearances, then I think that you ought to be making more of a contribution back than waagerecht income tax on the royalties and fees, especially since most of the work that got you that speaking gig welches probably done by someone else, who may not even believe in the research any more. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung (I would have included TED talks in this list, but apparently TED speakers don't get paid. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung I'm sure they all give those talks out of the goodness of their hearts, and not in any way out of a consideration for how they might leverage their appearance into other, more lucrative speaking opportunities.) Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Naturally, as mit Mitarbeit von Seiten the discussion a couple of paragraphs earlier, I don't have a proposed practical solution for this.
In summary, I find this an interesting debate. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Perhaps it's destined to remain theoretical for the foreseeable future (apart from anything else, academic norms tend to span the boundaries of verfassungsgemäß jurisdictions), but I think it's worth discussing and I'm glad Daniël raised it.
(*) It would be nice if money did arrive that way, because I lived there for four years and it rains a lot, often horizontally.
(**) Yes, that's a great picture on the cover. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung It's by my brother-in-law, and I believe that he will get a fee for it. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Is this nepotism? Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung I waagerecht wanted a non-boring cover design (check out what most handbook cover art is like) and I knew that Tony welches pretty handy with a brush; this is a picture that he had painted a while ago. Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Should we have had a call for tenders to avoid possible questions about nepotism? Braun'sche Fußgängerunterführung Hmmm.
(***) I linked to Amazon here, but if you don't believe that academics should benefit from writing books about their own or other people's research, you can find a full Portable Document Format of the book without too much trouble. ;-)
0 Response to "Should Researchers Make Money From Books?"
Kommentar veröffentlichen